A courtroom has refused to implement a 438 % annual curiosity cost imposed on a digital mortgage, signalling nearer judicial scrutiny of punitive cellular mortgage phrases even when debtors voluntarily settle for them earlier than receiving credit score.
The Small Claims Court docket in Nairobi dominated that Zenka Digital Restricted couldn’t implement contractual mortgage phrases requiring 36 % month-to-month curiosity, equal to 438 % yearly, and an extra 1.5 % every day default cost, translating to roughly 45 per cent month-to-month. It stated the charges had been punitive and unconscionable.
“The courtroom finds the claimed curiosity and penalties to be disproportionate and inequitable. The courtroom due to this fact declines to implement them,” the judgment stated.
The dispute arose from a Sh76,000 mortgage that Zenka superior to borrower Benson Njeru in September 2024 and was repayable inside one month. The full payable was Sh103,360. Njeru defaulted, prompting Zenka to sue, demanding a Sh152,000 fee.
The Justice of the Peace’s Court docket dominated that Zenka might solely get well the Sh76,000 it lent the borrower and declined to implement contractual curiosity and default costs that had raised its declare to Sh152,000.
“The rate of interest charged is unconscionable,” the Justice of the Peace stated within the judgment dated July 10, 2026. It famous the agreed 36 % month-to-month curiosity translated to about 438 % yearly.
“The rationale underlying the in duplum rule is to protect towards the extreme accumulation of curiosity and costs and to forestall a lender from recovering quantities which can be grossly disproportionate to the principal debt,” the courtroom stated.
She added that the lender additionally imposed “a every day default fee of 1.5 per cent, translating to roughly 45 per cent month-to-month.”
Digital lenders are a significant supply of fast unsecured credit score for hundreds of Kenyans who more and more depend on cellphones to borrow small and medium-sized quantities, making disputes over mortgage pricing and restoration an vital shopper finance subject.
The courtroom discovered that the lender had proved it disbursed the cash via the respondent’s M-Pesa account after reviewing the mortgage utility and fee information.
Nonetheless, the courtroom held that the agreed curiosity phrases produced an extreme monetary burden that the courtroom couldn’t implement.
The courtroom stated combining the month-to-month curiosity with the every day default cost would trigger the debt to develop quickly past the unique quantity borrowed.
“Such charges are able to producing a debt that bears no affordable relationship to the quantity borrowed and would end in an oppressive burden upon the borrower,” the courtroom stated.
The Justice of the Peace added that implementing these provisions “would offend the ideas of equity, fairness and good conscience that information the courtroom within the enforcement of contractual obligations.”
Whereas recognising that contracting events are typically sure by agreements they freely signal, the courtroom stated it retained discretion to refuse phrases producing unjust or unconscionable outcomes.
The courtroom as an alternative entered judgment for the principal sum of Sh76,000, awarded curiosity at 18 % yearly for 2 months from September 23, 2024, granted court-rate curiosity from the submitting of the go well with till fee in full, and awarded Zenka Sh10,000 in prices.
Mr Njeru had argued that the quantity claimed was exaggerated as a result of the curiosity exceeded what the regulation allowed. He additionally stated he had made repayments that had been omitted from the declare.
The courtroom rejected that argument as a result of no proof was produced to assist the alleged repayments.
“I do notice that although the respondent claimed it had made some funds, the identical was not supported by proof,” the Justice of the Peace stated.
