There are better ways to fight back than a full-on trade war

Article content material

I really had a subscriber in the US admonish me final week and name Canadians a bunch of crybabies and parasites.

Article content material

Article content material

Let me be clear.

The grand complete of fentanyl that crosses the Canadian border into the U.S. is a one per cent share. In the meantime, 90 per cent of the unlawful firearms that enter Canada come from the U.S. I doubt that final quantity comes as a shock to many since a Canadian can’t run out to the native ironmongery store and purchase a Glock.

Article content material

Extra to the purpose, globalization has harm Canada far more than it has impacted the U.S. Manufacturing employment in Canada is decrease at this time than it was in March 1977 (sure, that’s the case), and manufacturing unit output is under the extent in June 1999. Canada’s industrial base has been completely gutted over the a long time (not crying, simply reporting the details).

The rationale why the U.S. has such an enormous commerce deficit is as a result of it’s an economic system constructed on consumerism. It’s just about the one main nation on the planet with out a federal gross sales tax of some kind, and one of many few nations with a single-digit gross private financial savings charge — eight per cent in comparison with 12 per cent in Canada.

After all, the U.S. would have an enormous commerce deficit for an additional motive: gargantuan fiscal stimulus, which has taken the deficit-to-gross home product ratio to double the Group for Financial Co-operation and Improvement common of three per cent. Tack on the truth that Canada’s web efficient tariff charge is 1.8 per cent, which is decrease than the comparable 2.7 per cent charge south of the border. To not point out that just about the entire commerce hole between the 2 nations is concentrated within the useful resource sector — fundamental supplies (together with low-cost power) that American companies and households depend on.

Article content material

Article content material

That is all to say that there’s nothing stunning about tariffs and it’s a very inefficient option to bolster a rustic’s industrial base. In addition they threat disrupting North American provide chains. All Donald Trump’s commerce coverage right here goes to do is create complications for everybody. It’s more likely to backfire.

Right here’s why. First, I don’t agree that Canada ought to interact in a tit-for-tat commerce conflict with a rustic that takes in 20 per cent of Canadian GDP on the similar time that the U.S. ships just one per cent of its output into the tundra. Trump will solely hit again once more. Combat the bully within the schoolyard and you find yourself with two black eyes as a substitute of 1. I’d relatively nonetheless have one good eye.

Life isn’t honest, neither is that this difficulty, so there actually is nothing to be gained by crying about it or biting the hand that truly does feed you. Hitting again with tariffs, export taxes or power cargo blockages will solely deepen the recession that’s inevitable with the 25 per cent blanket tariff that Trump is promoting.

Let nature take its course. The Financial institution of Canada shall be slashing charges, fairly appropriately, with the U.S. Federal Reserve on maintain (Trump will discover out, as he did in 2018, that he doesn’t management U.S. financial coverage). The Canadian greenback will probably find yourself weakening to 62-63 cents U.S. with this shock, and that, in flip, will spur a growth in U.S. tourism and journey flows into Canada.

Article content material

The resort and airline business right here shall be in growth mode. Individuals will see that 40-plus per cent low cost on what the U.S. greenback offers them north of the border go to 60 per cent, and what Trump can anticipate is a flood of individuals visiting Canada and lengthening their visits with this almost unprecedented cut price. And since the president positively has no management over Canadian financial coverage, there may be nothing he can do about it. And he can’t put a tariff on vacationer and journey exercise.

As issues stand now, Canada’s bilateral commerce stability on journey has ballooned to file ranges (think about the place it goes with a fair weaker loonie), and the greenback influx of those tourism (and enterprise) receipts has ballooned almost 50 per cent over the previous yr.

In November alone, greater than two million U.S. residents visited Canada by land, air, or rail — 14 per cent greater than a yr in the past and again to pre-pandemic peaks. The variety of Canadians heading south has been just about flat over the previous 12 months and is at the moment 15 per cent under the pre-COVID-19 stage. That is why the forex is vital and why it’s that the forex is the perfect weapon Canada has in its arsenal.

Article content material

Trump slaps on a 25 per cent tariff and the subsequent factor you already know, the motels in Whistler, B.C., Toronto, Quebec Metropolis and Niagara Falls, Ont., shall be stuffed to the brim. And possibly, simply possibly, the three.5 million Canadian snowbirds that depart the brutal climate right here for sunny Florida (although not proper now) ought to rethink the place they wish to spend the winter. That may be fairly efficient retaliation.

I’m not positive folks know that these snowbirds contribute as a lot as US$10 billion to GDP and assist 1.6 million jobs within the Sunshine State. It wouldn’t be a horrible concept for Governor Ron DeSantis to pay a go to to Mar-a-Lago or at the very least lob in a name to his good buddy.

After all, an enormous hit to the Canadian greenback would trigger meals import costs to soar and we should remember the fact that Canadians import greater than 70 per cent of their annual consumption of meals. What I’d advocate to Ottawa, which it does have the fiscal capability to do, can be to cushion the blow with food-related tax rebates for low- and middle-income Canadians.

Article content material

In conclusion, Trump’s tariffs on Canada will carry with them the basic regulation of unintended penalties and nothing good goes to return out of it, and there are higher methods for Canadian policymakers to reply than partaking in a tit-for-tat commerce conflict, which is able to solely irritate the probably deep recession (rivalling the financial contraction in 1991 and never far off the true GDP decline in 1982).

David Rosenberg is founder and president of impartial analysis agency Rosenberg Analysis & Associates Inc. To obtain extra of David Rosenberg’s insights and evaluation, you may join a complimentary, one-month trial on the Rosenberg Analysis web site.

Bookmark our web site and assist our journalism: Don’t miss the enterprise information you should know — add financialpost.com to your bookmarks and join our newsletters right here.

Article content material