As outlined contribution (DC) plans proceed to evolve, plan sponsors face growing complexity in managing retirement advantages. With $12.5 trillion in property (3Q 2024) and accounting for one-third of all US retirement property, DC plans carry important accountability for making certain sturdy monetary outcomes for individuals1. In 2025, plan sponsors should deal with optimizing funding methods, decreasing prices, and enhancing participant training to enhance retirement readiness.
The highest priorities for DC plans in 2025 embody essential areas equivalent to goal date fund choice, charge transparency, funding lineup analysis, and staying forward of regulatory and litigation traits.
Focusing on Goal Date Funds (TDFs)
The Division of Labor’s steerage, Goal Date Retirement Funds — Suggestions for ERISA Plan Fiduciaries, outlines finest practices for TDF choice2. Key takeaways embody:
- Establishing a course of for choosing and evaluating TDFs and for periodic overview
- Understanding the TDFs’ underlying investments and the glidepath
- Reviewing the TDFs’ charges and funding bills
- Profiting from all accessible info within the overview and decision-making course of
- Documenting the method
- Growing efficient worker communications.
Implicit on this steerage are three key factors to think about. First, as with all funding course of, it is very important perceive the aim of the investments is to assist your distinctive group of staff make investments for retirement. Second, analyze the traits of the workforce by amassing workforce demographics, funding behavioral traits — generally present in studies produced by the recordkeeper — and different workforce knowledge. Lastly, set up the plan sponsor’s targets for the plan and total funding beliefs that can function a information when evaluating numerous TDFs. Making prudent funding choices requires these parts to drive the evaluation and establish TDFs which can be appropriate to your workforce.
Understanding Funding Charges and Share Lessons
We regularly see conditions the place the plan sponsor goes by means of the trouble of discovering an amazing funding technique after which selects a less-than-optimal funding car.
For instance, a plan sponsor or its advisor may choose a mutual fund share class for which the expense ratio consists of revenue-share {dollars}, that are paid to the advisor or collected by the recordkeeper to credit score in opposition to its charges, fairly than utilizing a zero-revenue share class. In different circumstances, a plan is likely to be eligible (meet the minimal funding threshold) for a collective funding belief (CIT) car with a decrease expense ratio than the mutual fund model(s) of the funding technique. Typically, these decisions or oversights lead to plan individuals paying increased funding charges and recordkeeper charges than if the plan sponsor had optimized the selection of funding car.
We propose plan sponsors take into account the impression on individuals of their present mutual fund share lessons, if not zero income, and whether or not the plan qualifies for identical CIT technique. We suggest plan sponsors use zero-revenue share lessons of mutual funds or collective funding trusts, as relevant, as they supply better charge transparency and infrequently decrease total charges, all else equal, than plans using revenue-sharing share lessons.
Evaluating Funding Lineup Construction
Most committees’ routine funding evaluations comply with an identical format: a have a look at the financial system and capital markets adopted by a overview of the efficiency and danger metrics of the funding menu. If there are funds on watch or in want of alternative, adjustments are mentioned. Whereas routine evaluations of plan fiduciaries are anticipated, we advise supplementing with a periodic overview of the funding lineup construction, that means funding classes (Determine 1) and whether or not they’re carried out with energetic administration or passive administration. We propose one of these overview at the very least each three years or earlier if workforce demographics change in a significant method.
Determine 1: Basic Funding Construction.
In Determine 1, we present a generic funding lineup construction. To judge the appropriateness of the lineup construction, plan sponsors ought to begin by plotting the present funding menu utilizing the columns proven. This visualization can facilitate dialogue about whether or not the present construction is suitable or whether or not funding classes must be altered. Elements for the dialogue may embody participant group funding information, age, demographics, and extent of retiree inhabitants within the plan.
Providing Complete Monetary Training Assets
In our 2024 Monetary Wellness within the Office Research, staff reported spending at the very least three hours per week worrying about private funds, with 68% stating that monetary stress negatively impacts their psychological well being. And three out of 4 employers acknowledged that staff’ monetary stress negatively impacts office operations3.
We’ve seen firsthand how monetary wellness advantages may also help staff enhance their monetary well being and scale back these challenges. Whereas conventional group conferences have traditionally performed a major function — notably for workforces the place a big share of the inhabitants shouldn’t be at a desk – there’s a significant enhance within the variety of plan sponsors and their staff in search of individualized one-on-one conferences with monetary educators. These personal conferences allow staff to have candid conversations about their distinctive monetary challenges.
Analyzing Committee Construction and Tasks
Employment traits from “the good resignation” to “the massive keep” and “the good reshuffling” illustrate the mobility of immediately’s workforce. These adjustments additionally negatively impression an organization’s retirement plan committee. Causes may range from altering positions to leaving the corporate or retirement.
Committees ought to get again to the fundamentals in 2025 by doing the next:
- Doc the committee construction and obligations
- Construct an onboarding training guidelines for brand spanking new committee members
- Preserve a calendar construction for fiduciary persevering with training
- Verify the fiduciary file is updated, together with the funding coverage assertion, govt summaries, and funding reporting
Monitoring Traits in Litigation and Regulation
With important provisions of the 2017 Tax Cuts and Job Acts expiring on the finish of 2025, there may be the potential for brand spanking new tax laws. Adjustments to tax-advantaged retirement applications can include tax laws, so will probably be necessary for plan sponsors to remain present on potential adjustments.
From a litigation standpoint, two main traits formed 2024: plan charges and utilization of forfeiture property.
Plan charges stay a perennial focus. Has the committee fulfilled its fiduciary responsibility to watch plan bills in order that they’re cheap for the providers offered? You will need to observe that this subject covers each vendor bills, equivalent to recordkeeping and advisor bills, and funding administration bills, equivalent to alternative of funding supervisor or the share class utilized.
The present wave of litigation concerning utilization of forfeiture property is a brand new phenomenon. The litigation has centered on whether or not plan sponsors are permitted to make use of forfeiture property to scale back employer contributions, or if they’re restricted to paying permissible vendor bills or distributing the funds to participant accounts.
With the potential for change and continued uptick in litigation, plan sponsors ought to collaborate with their advisors to remain on prime of those and different traits in regulation and litigation in 2025.
Plan sponsors play a pivotal function in shaping the monetary way forward for hundreds of thousands of staff. By prioritizing funding optimization, value effectivity, governance, and participant training, they will improve retirement outcomes and scale back fiduciary dangers. As market circumstances, workforce demographics, and regulatory landscapes evolve, steady evaluation and strategic decision-making shall be key to making sure DC plans stay efficient, aggressive, and aligned with participant wants. By specializing in these six priorities, plan sponsors can drive significant impression in 2025 and past.
Disclosures
The fabric offered herein is of a basic nature and doesn’t represent the availability by PNC of funding, authorized, tax, or accounting recommendation to any individual, or a suggestion to purchase or promote any safety or undertake any funding technique. The data contained herein was obtained from sources deemed reliable. Such info shouldn’t be assured as to its accuracy, timeliness, or completeness by PNC. The data contained and the opinions expressed herein are topic to vary with out discover.
The PNC Monetary Companies Group, Inc. (“PNC”) makes use of the advertising and marketing title PNC Institutional Asset Administration® for the varied discretionary and non-discretionary institutional funding, trustee, custody, consulting, and associated providers offered by PNC Financial institution, Nationwide Affiliation (“PNC Financial institution”), which is a Member FDIC, and funding administration actions performed by PNC Capital Advisors, LLC, a wholly-owned subsidiary of PNC Financial institution. PNC doesn’t present authorized, tax, or accounting recommendation except, with respect to tax recommendation, PNC Financial institution has entered right into a written tax providers settlement. PNC Financial institution shouldn’t be registered as a municipal advisor below the Dodd-Frank Wall Avenue Reform and Client Safety Act.
“PNC Institutional Asset Administration” is a registered mark of The PNC Monetary Companies Group, Inc. Investments: Not FDIC Insured. No Financial institution Assure. Could Lose Worth. ©2025 The PNC Monetary Companies Group, Inc. All rights reserved.
