The phrase “tariff” made its approach into English someday within the sixteenth century.
Hulton Archive/Getty Photographs
cover caption
toggle caption
Hulton Archive/Getty Photographs
Tariffs are President Trump’s favourite phrase. That is not an exaggeration.
“I all the time say ‘tariffs’ is probably the most lovely phrase to me within the dictionary,” he mentioned at a rally simply hours after his inauguration in January. “As a result of tariffs are going to make us wealthy as hell. It is going to convey our nation’s companies again that left us.”
His second administration hit the bottom working with a collection of threatened, imposed and delayed import duties, initially concentrating on Canada, Mexico, Colombia and China, in addition to merchandise together with metal, vehicles and automobile components.
Ever since, speak, threats and fears of tariffs have continued to dominate the discourse — within the U.S. and around the globe — particularly within the wake of Trump’s “Liberation Day” announcement.
These tariffs — a baseline minimal of 10% on all imports, plus extra taxes on items from dozens of nations — despatched markets tumbling and recession fears hovering after they have been unveiled final week. They prompted criticism from Wall Avenue and world leaders, they usually introduced a number of international locations to the negotiating desk, regardless of Trump’s insistence that they won’t be paused.
Mainstream economists have lengthy criticized tariffs as a barrier to free commerce that disproportionately burdens low-income U.S. customers. However Trump maintains that tariffs are key to defending American jobs and merchandise, elevating income, rebalancing the worldwide buying and selling system and alternately punishing and extracting concessions from different international locations.
“It is my favourite phrase,” he mentioned at an October 2024 occasion. “It wants a public relations agency to assist it, however to me it is probably the most lovely phrase within the dictionary.”
This raises the query: How did “tariff” get its identify? The phrase itself — like most in English — is definitely an import.
The place did the phrase come from?
President Trump’s “Liberation Day” tariffs embrace taxes on imported items from dozens of nations.
Nano Calvo/VW Pics/Common Photographs Group by way of Getty Photographs
cover caption
toggle caption
Nano Calvo/VW Pics/Common Photographs Group by way of Getty Photographs
“Tariff” actually means “a schedule of duties imposed by a authorities on imported or in some international locations exported items,” or the “responsibility or charge of responsibility imposed in such a schedule,” in response to Merriam-Webster.
The phrase initially referred to an inventory of costs within the context of delivery, linguist and content material creator Adam Aleksic advised NPR.
“It had the implication of a man at a dock with a desk [of prices], and he would cost items as they got here in by the great, based mostly on their worth within the desk,” he mentioned.
The phrase could be traced again to Latin in addition to the Arabic phrase “taʽrīf,” which means “notification” or “stock.”
World commerce disseminated variations of the phrase into different languages, together with French, Italian and Persian, earlier than it made its technique to English within the sixteenth century. Merriam-Webster dates the primary recognized use of “tariff” to 1592.
“There was lots of buying and selling with the Arabic world, which led to monetary and mathematical phrases being borrowed into Latin after which ultimately into English,” Aleksic mentioned.
Maybe sarcastically, it is fairly a worldwide journey for a phrase these days related to isolationism. However Aleksic says the trail it took is just not truly that uncommon.
“Even phrases that have been traced again to Previous English ultimately come from Proto-Indo-European,” he explains. “So all language is imported, in that sense.”
How has the phrase been used over time?
Members of the Senate Finance Committee meet to formulate a tariff invoice in 1929.
Bettmann Archive/
cover caption
toggle caption
Bettmann Archive/
Tariffs have been central to U.S. commerce coverage for the reason that nation’s founding.
“The second act handed by Congress was a tariff act,” Douglas Irwin, an economics professor at Dartmouth School, advised NPR’s Planet Cash. “And that is as a result of crucial downside that was dealing with the nation was the federal government had no cash.”
The Tariff Act of 1789 — which President George Washington signed on July 4 — positioned a 5% tax on all imports for the specific objective of defending home manufacturing and elevating income for the federal authorities.
By the mid-1800s, nonetheless, the targets of U.S. tariffs began to shift from income to restriction.
“U.S. trade had begun to develop up throughout this era,” Irwin defined. “Metal producers and others wished to maintain overseas metal and overseas textiles out of the U.S. market.”
The federal authorities handed the Tariff of 1828 — at a charge as excessive as 49% — in response to lobbying from Northern producers who wished to guard fledgling U.S. industries from British competitors, in response to the Invoice of Rights Institute.
But it surely was extremely unpopular amongst Southern planters, who relied on European commerce and had little to do with home manufacturing. They gave it one other identify: the Tariff of Abominations.
“Mainly, individuals have been as upset about tariffs as some are as we speak,” Aleksic mentioned. “Within the South significantly, individuals have been having this protectionist perspective towards tariffs which will actually be nonetheless at the moment informing our discourse downstream.”
South Carolina declared in 1832 that it might nullify the tariff inside its borders. That precipitated a battle between the state and federal authorities referred to as the Nullification Disaster, which ended solely with the passage of the Compromise Tariff of 1833 — and foreshadowed the Civil Battle.
Tariffs had made up some 90% of U.S. authorities income earlier than the Civil Battle, however that determine decreased to round 50% with the appearance of recent taxes to fund the conflict effort, in response to Historical past.com. Tariffs grew to become even much less essential income sources after the introduction of the revenue tax in 1913, however they have been more and more used to guard home industries from competitors.
The controversial Smoot-Hawley Tariff Act in 1930 raised tariffs on a variety of imports by a median of 20%, which prompted retaliatory tariffs from many different international locations and considerably disrupted international commerce. Whereas the tariffs did not single-handedly trigger the Nice Melancholy, many economists imagine they exacerbated america’ monetary downturn — and plenty of policymakers noticed the tariffs as a mistake.
The Reciprocal Commerce Agreements Act of 1934 is seen as ushering in a brand new period of commerce coverage centered on negotiating decrease tariff charges to advertise freer and fairer commerce. It continued into the postwar interval and past, resulting in the creation of the World Commerce Group and the North American Free Commerce Settlement within the Nineties.
All of this historical past issues as we speak, Aleksic says, pointing to the political — and patriotic — connotations of the phrase.
“When Trump says the phrase ‘tariff,’ he is not utilizing the phrase in isolation — he is utilizing it within the context of all of the tariffs which have occurred in U.S. historical past,” he says. “All of the cultural context of what it means to be American, within the context of tariffs, is one thing that folks carry with them, no matter whether or not they truly know that these tariffs have been round.”
Why does the phrase matter as we speak?
A billboard advert in Mumbai, India, gives commentary on President Trump’s tariffs.
Hindustan Instances by way of Getty Photographs/
cover caption
toggle caption
Hindustan Instances by way of Getty Photographs/
Whereas america’ insurance policies on tariffs have developed over the centuries, the which means of the phrase has successfully remained the identical. However Aleksic says it might be beginning to change.
He factors to Trump’s use of the time period “reciprocal tariffs” to explain the country-specific taxes he’s levying towards nations throughout Europe, Asia and the remainder of the world.
“Reciprocal” implies that these tariffs match the tariffs imposed by these international locations, however it is a bit of a misnomer right here: The White Home’s math reveals they don’t truly correspond to the precise tariff charges in different international locations.
“[Trump is] not utilizing ‘tariff’ in that historic sense of a set worth taking place in an arithmetic desk,” Aleksic mentioned. “He is as a substitute utilizing it as basic financial punishment or, I assume within the literal White Home definition, commerce deficit over complete items imported.”
In different phrases, the definition of “tariff” appears to be widening past merely a charge of tax. Aleksic calls this an instance of “semantic broadening,” which occurs on a regular basis in language and is not inherently trigger for concern from a linguistics perspective.
That does not imply it isn’t noteworthy.
“One must be conscious when phrases change which means in politics, as a result of they’re usually getting used as loaded language or canine whistles or buzzwords,” he mentioned. “And I feel there’s a part of ‘tariff’ proper now that may be a political buzzword for positive.”
