The announcement by Wix (Nasdaq: WIX) final week of a return to the format to full-time work on the workplace and an finish to working from dwelling has raised a storm on social media, and has swiftly change into a dialogue in precept on work tradition, administration, and the place the tech business goes within the AI period.
The corporate has introduced that, from February 1, Wix workers in Israel will work 5 days on the workplace, along with chosen groups in Europe, the exception being workers in Ukraine who will proceed to work wherever is handy and secure for them, because the battle there continues.
The administration careworn that discretion can be exercised in particular person instances. Within the discover to workers, firm president Nir Zohar wrote that Wix had at all times believed in teamwork, and that in a interval of speedy technological change caused by AI, bodily presence had a decisive worth. He went on to say that working facet by facet allowed nearer cooperation, quick determination making, and a every day dynamic arduous to copy remotely.
One of the crucial outstanding criticisms following the announcement got here from social psychologist Dr. Liraz Margalit, who claimed {that a} deeper transfer lay behind the choice than administration’s desire for bodily presence at work, and that the corporate’s official explanations had been unsatisfactory. “If it had been actually a matter of cooperation, 4 days on the workplace can be sufficient,” she wrote, including, “One thing deeper is occurring right here.”
Margalit makes a connection between the transfer and the erosion of Wix’s aggressive benefit due to AI. “The thought on which Wix primarily based its empire, bringing down boundaries to constructing a digital presence, has all of a sudden change into a lot simpler to breed. There’s no must learn to construct a web site; AI does it with one click on,” she wrote, and so it’s not only a matter of competitors, however of commoditization.
In a scenario like that, Margalit argues, “The aggressive benefit is eroded, and the risk turns into existential.” When organizations really feel such a risk, she says, they don’t change into extra inventive, they tighten up. This implies much less room for interpretation, much less unconventional pondering, and extra of a single norm that retains everybody in line.” Margalit provides that it’s no coincidence that the transfer focuses significantly on Israel. “When an organization must reinvent itself within the face of a technological risk, it goes again to its core. It wants its technological and inventive core shut, in a single room, with out Zoom delay and with out being in separate houses.”
RELATED ARTICLES
Wix orders workers again to workplace full time
Wix jumps on PayPal collaboration
Wix co-founder’s new enterprise revealed
Wix enters banking as AI threatens core enterprise
In a broader context, she compares the transfer to steps taken by Elon Musk after he purchased Twitter. “A system doesn’t essentially break up when flexibility is minimize, it merely re-forms,” she wrote. In keeping with Margalit, even when steps reminiscent of this result in workers resigning, they go away behind “a core of individuals ready to sacrifice all the pieces for the sake of the mission,” and sign “a real reset” that redefines requirements and dedication within the enterprise.
A value in competitors over expertise
Shiri Vax, CEO of placement firm GotFriends, wrote on her Fb web page that measures to cut back working from dwelling had been liable to precise an actual value within the competitors over expertise. She says that the info she has gathered point out a widening hole between administration choices and employees’ expectations. “Whereas some firms are pushing for a return to full-time work within the workplace, about 80% of skilled employees, these with over 4 years expertise, nonetheless see the hybrid mannequin as a primary situation for contemplating altering jobs,” she wrote.
In keeping with Vax, greater than 50% of the roles that opened up within the second half of 2025 supply a minimum of two days working from dwelling, which signifies that the market has not deserted the hybrid mannequin. At a time when demand for AI consultants has doubled and competitors over high-quality manpower is turning into fiercer, she warns that “an organization that chooses to swim towards the tide and scale back days working from house is liable to find that the expertise merely chooses the corporate next-door.” She provides that, from her administration expertise, it’s doable to fulfill targets and even develop with hybrid working, which reduces burnout and permits workers to mix household life and a profession.
Then again
There are additionally these on social networks who defend Wix’s administration. Former workers and others within the business say that perception in working head to head was a part of Wix’s idea a very long time earlier than the Covid pandemic, and that the corporate has at all times seen direct private interplay as a important engine of innovation and efficiency. They are saying that the choice stems from a coherent administration idea and isn’t an opportunistic response to altering market situations.
There’s additionally criticism of the knowledge expressed by those that oppose the transfer. Defenders of the corporate say that the convenience with which it’s predicted that workers will go away en masse and that the corporate will lose its attractiveness ignores the truth that this can be a firm that has succeeded in rising from zero to a market cap of billions and continues to be run by its founder and a veteran administration crew. Of their view, the flexibility to make an unpopular determination, however one that’s per the ethos of the corporate, is an expression of confidence on administration’s half and never weak spot.
The defenders are joined by Shahar Cohen, managing companion of Lucid Capital, who wrote, “Working from dwelling – anybody who thinks that Wix is making a mistake is welcome to hearken to companions at Andreessen Horowitz, Elon Musk, the CEO of Amazon, and others. It doesn’t work in the long term in massive organizations. Juniors don’t be taught, the work ethic drifts (it begins with a 30-minute break, then individuals take a day snooze, after that they schedule a three-hour errand in the course of the day…)”
Printed by Globes, Israel enterprise information – en.globes.co.il – on January 11, 2026.
© Copyright of Globes Writer Itonut (1983) Ltd., 2026.












