A file photograph of Union Residence Minister Amit Shah. The federal government will introduce three payments in Parliament on Wednesday mandating the elimination of a primary minister, Union minister, chief minister, or state minister if arrested and detained on severe felony costs for 30 consecutive days. On the thirty first day, they’d robotically lose their submit in the event that they fail to resign
| Picture Credit score:
ANI
The federal government is planning to introduce three payments in Parliament on Wednesday for the elimination of a primary minister, a Union minister, a chief minister or a minister of a state or Union Territory when arrested or detained on severe felony costs for 30 days in a row.
If any considered one of them is arrested and detained in custody for consecutive 30 days for offences that entice a jail time period of at the least 5 years, they may lose their job on the thirty first day.
These payments are the Authorities of Union Territories (Modification) Invoice 2025; the Structure (One Hundred And Thirtieth Modification) Invoice 2025; and the Jammu and Kashmir Reorganisation (Modification) Invoice 2025.
Union Residence Minister Amit Shah may even transfer a movement within the Lok Sabha to refer these three payments to a joint committee of Parliament.
Previous examples
Apparently, former Delhi chief minister Arvind Kejriwal and Tamil Nadu minister V Senthil Balaji had not resigned from their posts ever after their arrests on completely different costs.
Invoice provisions
“A minister, who for any interval of 30 consecutive days throughout holding the workplace as such, is arrested and detained in custody, on allegation of committing an offence underneath any regulation in the intervening time in pressure, which is punishable with imprisonment for a time period which can prolong to 5 years or extra, shall be faraway from his workplace by the President on the recommendation of the Prime Minister to be tendered by the thirty-first day, after being taken in such custody,” one of many invoice says.
It additionally stated: “Supplied that if the recommendation of the prime minister, for the elimination of such minister will not be tendered to the President by the thirty-first day, he shall stop to be a minister, with impact from the day falling thereafter”.
Prime Minister clause
“Supplied additional that in case of the prime minister, who for any interval of 30 consecutive days throughout holding the workplace as such, is arrested and detained in custody, on allegation of committing an offence underneath any regulation in the intervening time in pressure, which is punishable with imprisonment for a time period which can prolong to 5 years or extra, shall tender his resignation by the thirty-first day after such arrest and detention, and if he doesn’t tender his resignation, he shall stop to be the Prime Minister with impact from the day falling thereafter,” it added.
Union Territories invoice
In accordance with the assertion of objects and causes of the Authorities of Union Territories (Modification) Invoice 2025, there isn’t any provision underneath the Authorities of Union Territories Act, 1963 (20 of 1963) for the elimination of the chief minister or a minister arrested and detained in custody on account of great felony costs.
Therefore, there’s a have to amend part 45 of the Authorities of Union Territories Act, 1963, to offer a authorized framework for the elimination of a chief minister or a minister in such circumstances. The Invoice seeks to attain the above targets.
The targets of the Structure (One Hundred And Thirtieth Modification) Invoice, 2025, say there isn’t any provision underneath the Structure for the elimination of a minister who’s arrested and detained in custody on account of great felony costs.
Therefore, there’s a have to amend Articles 75, 164 and 239AA of the Structure, for offering a authorized framework for the elimination of the prime minister or a minister within the Union Council of Ministers and the chief minister or a minister within the Council of Ministers of States and the Nationwide Capital Territory of Delhi in such circumstances. This invoice seeks to attain the above targets.
J&Okay invoice
The targets of the Jammu and Kashmir Reorganisation (Modification) Invoice, 2025, say there isn’t any provision underneath the Jammu and Kashmir Reorganisation Act, 2019 (34 of 2019) for the elimination of the chief minister or a minister arrested and detained in custody on account of great felony costs.
Therefore, there’s a have to amend part 54 of the Jammu and Kashmir Reorganisation Act, 2019, to offer a authorized framework for the elimination of the Chief Minister or a Minister in such circumstances. The Invoice seeks to attain the above targets.
Revealed on August 20, 2025
