Folks take part in a rally to name on Congress to guard funding for public broadcasters PBS and NPR exterior the NPR headquarters in Washington, DC, on March 26, 2025.
Saul Loeb/AFP/Getty Photographs
disguise caption
toggle caption
Saul Loeb/AFP/Getty Photographs
President Trump took yet one more step Tuesday to put NPR and PBS on the heart of his broader conflict with main cultural establishments, formally asking Congress to take again the $1.1 billion it has put aside for all public broadcasters for the following two years.
A easy majority of lawmakers in every chamber should approve what’s technically often known as a “rescission request” inside 45 days for it to grow to be legislation. With their slim leads in each the Home and Senate, Republicans can afford just some defections.
A Home subcommittee listening to earlier this spring set the stage for Trump’s request. His Republican allies accused NPR and PBS of partisan bias. Lawmakers used the listening to as a springboard to argue for elimination of the federal funding that’s funneled via the Company for Public Broadcasting to native stations and the general public media networks.
PBS President and CEO Paula Kerger testified at that listening to. On Tuesday, she warned that Trump’s proposal would devastate public broadcasting stations, significantly in rural communities.
“With out PBS member stations, People will lose distinctive native programming and emergency companies in occasions of disaster,” she stated in an announcement. “There’s nothing extra American than PBS and we’re proud to spotlight actual points, people, and locations that might in any other case be ignored by industrial media.”
Katherine Maher, the CEO and president of NPR, echoed these sentiments and stated that native public radio stations may face “fast funds shortfalls,” resulting in layoffs and present cancellations. She additionally questioned the legality of the request.
“The proposal, which is explicitly viewpoint-based and geared toward controlling and punishing content material, violates the Public Broadcasting Act, the First Modification, and the Due Course of Clause,” Maher stated in an announcement.
Taking a cue from DOGE on international assist
The cuts to public broadcasting are half of a bigger package deal from the White Home of $9.4 billion in proposed clawbacks, which embrace funding for international assist. Home Speaker Mike Johnson famous that lots of the cuts have been recognized by the duty pressure on authorities effectivity led by billionaire Elon Musk.
“We thank Elon Musk and his DOGE staff for figuring out a variety of wasteful, duplicative, and outdated applications, and Home Republicans are desirous to remove them,” Johnson stated in an announcement, vowing to behave shortly on the request.
But that might show tough within the Senate. Senate Appropriations Committee Chair Susan Collins, R-Maine, famous the request included a minimize to the HIV/AIDS program began by President George W. Bush that is called PEPFAR. Collins stated it was “one of the crucial profitable public well being applications on the earth definitely.”
“I cannot assist a minimize in PEPFAR, which is a program that has saved actually hundreds of thousands of lives and has been extraordinarily efficient and effectively run,” Collins advised reporters. She sidestepped a query on cuts to public broadcasting and whether or not there have been sufficient Senate Republicans to dam the invoice.
The rescission request follows grousing from conservative Republicans that the funds plan the Home lately permitted solely after Trump visited Capitol Hill would considerably increase the federal debt in coming years.

But the $1.1 billion to be rescinded from public broadcasting would make little dent within the $36 trillion nationwide debt, even because it represents the total funding ranges for the Company for Public Broadcasting via the tip of September 2027. Congress permitted that funding in March as a part of a stopgap spending invoice the president signed.
A cut up largely alongside partisan traces
Whereas public broadcasting has loved bipartisan assist over its many years of existence, many Republicans contemplate it to have a liberal outlook or bias.
“NPR and PBS have more and more grow to be radical, left-wing echo chambers for a slender viewers of principally rich, white, city liberals and progressives,” Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene of Georgia, a vocal Trump ally, stated on the subcommittee listening to earlier this spring.
Even so, Alaska Sen. Lisa Murkowski, a Republican, got here out final month in favor of retaining federal funding, saying stations in her state present important companies.
Some main Democrats even have flagged their enduring assist for the networks. Senate Minority Chief Chuck Schumer and Sen. Patty Murray, the main Democrat on the Senate Appropriations Committee, accused Trump of “misplaced priorities.”
“President Trump is seeking to go after PBS and NPR to settle political scores and muzzle the free press, whereas undermining international help applications that push again on China’s malign affect, save lives, and handle different bipartisan priorities,” the 2 senators stated in an announcement.
Rep. Dan Goldman of New York, the Democratic co-chair of the Home Public Broadcasting Caucus, despatched a letter in Could signed by 106 lawmakers – all Democrats – to Home appropriators by which they advocated for sustaining monetary subsidies.
“With out federal assist for public broadcasting, many localities would battle to obtain well timed, dependable native information and academic content material, particularly distant and rural communities that industrial newsrooms are more and more much less prone to spend money on,” acknowledged the letter. “In states akin to Alaska, Minnesota, North Dakota, and Texas, rural public radio stations are sometimes the solely weekly or each day information supply of their communities. Even in locations with different each day or weekly information sources, these shops is probably not directing sources towards unique or regionally primarily based tales, leaving it to public stations to fill the hole.”
A broader assault on public media
The rescission request represents an enlargement of Trump’s rhetorical assaults on NPR and PBS. He has beforehand sought to take management of CPB’s board by ordering the firing of three of its 5 members. He additionally issued an government order stating that no cash from CPB can go to NPR or PBS – and that different public broadcasters that obtain CPB cash can’t ship it to the 2 nationwide networks.
These strikes are actually being questioned in courtroom. CPB is privately included within the District of Columbia and was arrange by Congress with statutory safeguards towards political affect. It sued the Trump White Home over the try to fireside CPB administrators. Then NPR and three Colorado member stations sued the administration over Trump’s edict that no federal taxpayer cash go to NPR or PBS. On the finish of Could, PBS and Minnesota affiliate Lakeland PBS adopted up with their very own joint lawsuit difficult the chief order.
Asking Congress to claw again funds, nonetheless, is certainly authorized. And it has prompted a flurry of lobbying. Officers from practically 200 public radio stations flooded Capitol Hill in Could to inform lawmakers in regards to the worth they are saying they carry to their communities and areas.
By legislation, Trump’s request kicks off the 45-day interval for Congress to think about his request. The final time a president efficiently made a rescission request was a technology in the past.
Disclosure: This story was reported and written by NPR Media Correspondent David Folkenflik and NPR Congressional Correspondent Deirdre Walsh. It was edited by Deputy Enterprise Editor Emily Kopp, Managing Editor Vickie Walton-James and Managing Editor Gerry Holmes. Beneath NPR’s protocol for reporting on itself, no company official or information government reviewed this story earlier than it was posted publicly.