How DOGE’s Targeting of CFPB and HUD Really Impacts Real Estate

In This Article

It looks like nearly everybody has a robust opinion on the Elon Musk-led Division of Authorities Effectivity (DOGE) that matches in with the partisan divisions which have turn into so outstanding in our society as we speak. Some have even gone as far as to set Tesla vehicles on hearth. Personally, although, I’m moderately ambivalent.

For one, the U.S. authorities is clearly bloated, spending $6.9 trillion per 12 months as of 2024, with monumental quantities of waste and cronyism. Alternatively, it’s an undeniably dangerous look to have the richest man on the earth main a bunch that’s firing hundreds of individuals. The host of overblown and exaggerated claims coming from DOGE hasn’t helped both. 

The largest impact DOGE might have on the housing market is by far its face-off with the Division of Housing and City Growth (HUD). In response to HUD’s Trump-appointed Secretary, there are $260 million in cuts coming, and a few reviews declare that as a lot as 50% of HUD’s workforce might be laid off.

Whereas such an motion would actually save taxpayers cash, it might additionally end in a wide range of issues, together with delays in Part 8’s (already sluggish) funds. For extra about this political combat and the results it might have for actual property traders, please see Jeff Vasishta’s wonderful article right here on BiggerPockets.

DOGE’s Many Targets

DOGE’s first main goal was USAID. Whereas admittedly USAID does present essential companies to poor nations, the company has additionally wasted some huge cash in a typically absurd vogue, together with $2 million for pottery lessons in Morocco, $20 million to make a Sesame Avenue-like present in Iraq, $2 million to assist fund gender transitions in Guatemala, and $1 million for the lab in Wuhan the place COVID-19 very nicely may need leaked from. 

Furthermore, USAID has a darkish underside. One among its main beneficiaries is the Nationwide Endowment for Democracy (NED). Actually, the NED acquired about 90% of its $3 billion funds from USAID in 2023, making it a de facto authorities company.  And the federal government company it resembles most is the Central Intelligence Company. Because the NED’s cofounder Allen Weinstein put it, “Numerous what we do as we speak was accomplished covertly 25 years in the past by the CIA.”

For anybody who’s questioning, the CIA doesn’t precisely have a superb historical past of supporting democracy. 

Certainly, the NED has been caught meddling in a number of nations’ inside politics and supporting quite a few colour revolutions since its founding. Maybe that is worthwhile, however in the standard opinion of this creator, the U.S. authorities has no enterprise interfering within the politics of international nations on this method and positively shouldn’t be doing it on the taxpayers’ dime.

Sadly, DOGE hasn’t accomplished a lot to go after company welfare or the bloated navy funds. Nevertheless it’s additionally essential to acknowledge that not all taxpayer cash is so poorly spent. And one of DOGE’s more moderen targets would save little cash and will genuinely hurt customers, in addition to actual property traders. 

DOGE vs. the Shopper Monetary Safety Board

Thus, we flip to DOGE’s battle with the Shopper Monetary Safety Board (CFPB), the brainchild of left-wing Senator Elizabeth Warren that was based in 2011 within the wake of the actual property collapse and monetary disaster. DOGE nearly instantly put the CFPB in its sights, and on Feb. 10, the Trump administration stopped work on the CFPB. A court docket injunction prevented the company from being shut down for now, however as of this writing, its future could be very a lot doubtful.

Whereas initially, this could look like a clear-cut case of a partisan disagreement, do not forget that Trump ran as a populist, so ending a client safety company shouldn’t essentially match together with his ostensible agenda.

Moreover, the CFPB’s annual funds is simply $823 million as of fiscal 12 months 2023, and it has a employees of beneath 1,700. This might sound like so much, however with a federal funds of $6.8 trillion in 2024, it’s mere peanuts in financial savings. 

There are actually some official criticisms of the CFPB. For one, it’s well-known that extreme regulation can cut back financial progress. Regulation additionally tends to harm smaller companies greater than greater ones, given the bigger relative compliance prices.

One other criticism is that the CFPB has tended to be reactive. It has stopped some abuses and punished offenders, however it has not stopped a main scandal from occurring. 

However by far essentially the most official critique is that the CFPB isn’t topic to congressional funds approval, which provides it plenty of energy to behave with out a lot oversight to restrain it. This might positively result in political bias, particularly given it was arrange by main Democrats, in addition to the flexibility to abuse its energy.

That being mentioned, such an issue might simply be remedied with reform. How about laws to make the CFPB answerable to Congress as a substitute of merely ending it? In any case, if you take a look at what the CFPB has accomplished, it’s laborious to argue with a lot of it:

That final one is noteworthy, because the Senate simply voted to elevate the cap on financial institution overdraft charges. I attempt to not be too political in these articles and have actually criticized the Democrats earlier than, however I sincerely doubt even a tiny fraction of Trump’s base have been voting for banks to have the ability to gouge them extra in the event that they by accident overdraw their account.

On a extra speculative observe, I consider among the DOGE’s hostility towards the CFPB comes from Elon Musk’s good friend Marc Andreessen (who has a doubtful historical past within the crypto area). Andreessen vehemently complained in regards to the CFPB earlier than the election:

“…we now have this factor known as the Shopper Finance Safety Bureau, CFPB, which is form of Elizabeth Warren’s private company that she will get to manage. And it’s an unbiased company that will get to run and do no matter it desires, proper? And in case you learn the Structure, there isn’t any such factor as unbiased company, and but there it’s… 

“…That is the place so much of the debanking comes from these companies. So debanking is if you as both an individual or your organization are actually kicked out of the banking system.”

He then provides the instance of rapper Kanye West (who was debanked, however by the banks themselves, not by the CFPB). 

For one, since a lot of the federal authorities isn’t talked about within the Structure, I see no motive to single out the CFPB. There may be additionally no proof the CFPB is Elizabeth Warren’s “private company.” Nor have I been capable of finding something in regards to the CFPB debanking people or firms apart from some regulatory proposals relating to crypto.

That is, after all, to not say that debanking isn’t a difficulty. It most actually is. There very nicely could also be some issues with debanking within the fintech area. However furthermore, political dissidents, specifically, may be focused, which has critical ramifications without spending a dime speech. The flexibility of highly effective authorities companies or non-public establishments to successfully take away somebody’s potential to take part within the financial system is moderately terrifying, and I feel it justifies the overused time period “Orwellian.” 

However the CFPB isn’t the wrongdoer. Actually, right here’s what its former head of the CFPB, Rohit Chopra, mentioned on the topic:

“Plenty of individuals are shedding their accounts, and, in some circumstances, are placed on an industrywide blacklist, stopping them from opening accounts elsewhere… [banks] ought to solely have the flexibility to [close accounts] when there’s some affordable enterprise justification or a really clear regulation or regulation that they’re following.”

My private take is that the crypto area has come beneath rising scrutiny after the collapse of FTX and the rising variety of pump-and-dump scams. And this added scrutiny isn’t one thing Andreessen desires, given Andreessen-Horowitz’s funding in crypto. Andreessen’s animosity then seemingly rubbed off on Musk and, by way of Musk, DOGE. However that’s, admittedly, hypothesis.

How Ending the CFPB Might Have an effect on Actual Property

The CFPB was created within the wake of an actual property crash, so it shouldn’t be shocking that it oversees and enforces a number of actual estate-related laws. Probably the most noteworthy is the RESPA (Actual Property Settlement Procedures Act). This act requires a wide range of disclosures and prohibits kickbacks, referral charges, and the like. Most of those disclosures appear unhelpful to me, however essentially the most they add is a trouble.

Extra importantly, the CFPB additionally enforces Regulation Z (additionally known as the Reality in Lending Act), which requires lenders to reveal the precise APR (annual proportion fee) of any mortgage. The APR takes under consideration the charges and prices of closing the mortgage and makes it more durable for dangerous actors to drag one over on subtle debtors.

That being mentioned, ending the CFPB will not finish both RESPA or Regulation Z; it should merely change who enforces these statutes. It might cut back enforcement, however that’s speculative. 

The CFPB has additionally made a proposal to assist householders keep away from foreclosures by prioritizing help and different such actions. I’ve lengthy thought the smartest thing the federal and state governments might do to cut back the variety of foreclosures and evictions is to present assist for these struggling to make funds. However with the CFPB in DOGE’s crosshairs, this proposal is unlikely to go wherever.

Sooner or later, the CFPB might probably determine to go after housing in a wide range of different methods, some dangerous. There have been plenty of native actions taken towards property homeowners which have largely been dangerous, so this wouldn’t be shocking. 

One risk is it might attempt to cap late charges for delinquent lease. In fact, there needs to be a cap of some type on that. Nevertheless, regulatory companies have a protracted historical past of going too far on such issues, and this could actually be an area and state concern. However that’s all conjecture. The CFPB had not made any such strikes as much as the date of this writing.

Certainly, the largest impact eradicating the CFPB might have for actual property traders is probably going oblique. People are being pinched laborious proper now financially, and ending among the CFPB’s protections might exacerbate that. Housing affordability—each for renters and householders—is as dangerous as it’s ever been. Permitting overdraft charges to balloon and malicious payday lenders to cost exorbitant charges to unqualified debtors is simply going to make the issue even worse, significantly for the poorest amongst us.

And lots of such folks lease from us traders right here at BiggerPockets. Whereas delinquency charges have decreased because the pandemic ended, many renters are nonetheless strapped. These adjustments might push a few of them into delinquency. 

Others are attempting to purchase their first home hack, and each bit helps when saving up for that. Getting gouged with petty charges makes that just a bit bit more durable. 

So wh,ile the direct impact on the actual property trade of ending the CFPB will seemingly be moderately small, the oblique results might be pretty detrimental. And the impact on the nation nearly actually can be. The Shopper Monetary Safety Board needs to be reformed to be extra accountable to Congress, however it needs to be faraway from DOGE’s chopping block and stick round.